Results for "Author: mark jackson"

To gather info on word frequency in a document. This one is fast. I use arrays of bytes instead of strings to speed up the program. Compared to a string based version (like the one posted by lordaych, on 2/25/02 - called "Word Frequency Analyser"), this version is up to 40 times as fast.

To gather info on word frequency in a document. This one is fast. I use arrays of bytes instead of strings to speed up the program. Compared to a string based version (like the one posted by lordaych, on 2/25/02 - called "Word Frequency Analyser"), this version is up to 40 times as fast.

To gather info on word frequency in a document. This one is fast. I use arrays of bytes instead of strings to speed up the program. Compared to a string based version (like the one posted by lordaych, on 2/25/02 - called "Word Frequency Analyser"), this version is up to 40 times as fast.

To gather info on word frequency in a document. This one is fast. I use arrays of bytes instead of strings to speed up the program. Compared to a string based version (like the one posted by lordaych, on 2/25/02 - called "Word Frequency Analyser"), this version is up to 40 times as fast.

To gather info on word frequency in a document. This one is fast. I use arrays of bytes instead of strings to speed up the program. Compared to a string based version (like the one posted by lordaych, on 2/25/02 - called "Word Frequency Analyser"), this version is up to 40 times as fast.

To gather info on word frequency in a document. This one is fast. I use arrays of bytes instead of strings to speed up the program. Compared to a string based version (like the one posted by lordaych, on 2/25/02 - called "Word Frequency Analyser"), this version is up to 40 times as fast.

To gather info on word frequency in a document. This one is fast. I use arrays of bytes instead of strings to speed up the program. Compared to a string based version (like the one posted by lordaych, on 2/25/02 - called "Word Frequency Analyser"), this version is up to 40 times as fast.

To gather info on word frequency in a document. This one is fast. I use arrays of bytes instead of strings to speed up the program. Compared to a string based version (like the one posted by lordaych, on 2/25/02 - called "Word Frequency Analyser"), this version is up to 40 times as fast.

To gather info on word frequency in a document. This one is fast. I use arrays of bytes instead of strings to speed up the program. Compared to a string based version (like the one posted by lordaych, on 2/25/02 - called "Word Frequency Analyser"), this version is up to 40 times as fast.

To gather info on word frequency in a document. This one is fast. I use arrays of bytes instead of strings to speed up the program. Compared to a string based version (like the one posted by lordaych, on 2/25/02 - called "Word Frequency Analyser"), this version is up to 40 times as fast.

To gather info on word frequency in a document. This one is fast. I use arrays of bytes instead of strings to speed up the program. Compared to a string based version (like the one posted by lordaych, on 2/25/02 - called "Word Frequency Analyser"), this version is up to 40 times as fast.

To gather info on word frequency in a document. This one is fast. I use arrays of bytes instead of strings to speed up the program. Compared to a string based version (like the one posted by lordaych, on 2/25/02 - called "Word Frequency Analyser"), this version is up to 40 times as fast.

To gather info on word frequency in a document. This one is fast. I use arrays of bytes instead of strings to speed up the program. Compared to a string based version (like the one posted by lordaych, on 2/25/02 - called "Word Frequency Analyser"), this version is up to 40 times as fast.

To gather info on word frequency in a document. This one is fast. I use arrays of bytes instead of strings to speed up the program. Compared to a string based version (like the one posted by lordaych, on 2/25/02 - called "Word Frequency Analyser"), this version is up to 40 times as fast.